Controversy Surrounds AI-Generated Stock Image Used by Adobe

Controversy Surrounds AI-Generated Stock Image Used by Adobe

Recently, Adobe has found itself in a scandal involving an AI-generated stock image of a Gaza explosion. The image was used by multiple small blogs and websites without being labeled as AI-generated. The issue was brought to light by the Australian news outlet Crikey, causing significant pushback on social media platforms.

An Adobe spokesperson responded to the controversy, stating that all generative AI content on Adobe Stock is required to be labeled as such when submitted for licensing. These specific images were appropriately labeled as generative AI from the beginning. Adobe believes that it is essential for customers to be aware of whether AI tools were used to create images they access through Adobe Stock.

Ads
  

Adobe Stock’s Focus on Imagery

Adobe Stock is a service that offers designers and businesses access to a wide range of high-quality curated and royalty-free photos, videos, illustrations, vector graphics, assets, and templates for creative projects. However, it is less known for its editorial or photojournalism imagery compared to competitors like Getty Images. While Adobe Stock previously had partnerships for editorial assets, it no longer includes them as part of its stock offering.

Adobe Stock places emphasis on the storytelling possibilities of its stock imagery, both traditional and AI-generated. On their website, Adobe defines “illustrative editorial” as conceptual imagery designed to accompany articles on current events and newsworthy topics. Adobe clarifies that this is distinct from traditional editorial content, which documents ongoing or past events.

Ads
  

Previous Issues with Adobe Stock

This is not the first time Adobe Stock has faced controversy surrounding generative AI. In June, a group of contributors who provide content for Adobe Stock claimed that their stock images were used without proper notification or consent to train Adobe’s AI model, Firefly. These contributors argued that Firefly’s popularity was diminishing the demand for stock images and cannibalizing Adobe Stock as a platform. Adobe responded by stating that they respect the rights of third parties and require contributors to abide by their terms of service, including those related to generative AI tools.

Ads
  

Source: Adobe responds to controversy over AI-generated images of Gaza explosion

Similar Posts